What’s in a name?
One of the best things about Wi-Fi 6 is that the Wi-Fi Alliance (WFA) has decided to mark the inflection point that Wi-Fi 6 represents by giving it a memorable name and a fresh
beginning. ‘Out’ goes the technical committee document number approach of the IEEE, which had earlier burdened it with ‘IEEE 802.11ax’ (its predecessor was IEEE 802.11ac).
Being known by a simple number has several plus points. It fits with what’s now become the standard popular technology naming convention and that seems to give it force. For
instance Apple’s iOS is firmly numeric – 11, 12, 13, etc.
The ‘6’ also makes it seem one step ahead of 5G (don’t imagine that this wasn’t a factor). Plus it has ongoing marketing advantages as it suggests progression: if Wi-Fi 6 is good,
it suggests, Wi-Fi 7 will be even better. IEEE 802.11ax, on the other hand belongs with the small print at the very end of the user manual.
But there’s also substance. The latest Wi-Fi 6 technology delivers more data in less time between exponentially more devices. Wi-Fi 6 devices will have enough processor speed and
horsepower to process signals using OFDMA (Orthogonal frequency-division multiple access) which enables the systems to subdivide spectrum and allocate it to many users simultaneously, resulting in greater determinism and lower latency for
real-time applications. Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) didn’t use OFDMA.
It also employs MIMO (multiple-input and multiple-output) to multiply the capacity of the radio link using multiple transmission and receiving antennas to exploit multipath
propagation.
And it can use both multi-user MIMO and OFDMA simultaneously. So while ‘nominal’ data rates are significantly improved in Wi-Fi 6, the standard doubles down on spectrum-sharing and
re-use between devices and the device horsepower enables all these separate streams, with disparate quality of service requirements, to be managed in useful ways that make Wi-Fi 6 a prime candidate for ‘peer-to-peer’ integration with 5G
which sports similar capabilities.
To get the HPE ‘Perspective’ on Wi-Fi 6 and 5G, we talked with Stuart Strickland, Distinguished Technologist in the CTO team at Aruba, the Wi-Fi subsidiary of
HPE.
Stuart is an ideal source. He’s no one-eyed Wi-Fi 6 advocate but actually specialises in the cross-over of the two technologies with a special focus on strategic planning for Wi-Fi
in relation to cell networks. He spends a lot of time and air miles on standards work in this area and he makes a strong case that given their starting points it’s hardly surprising that cellular and Wi-Fi have both followed the science and
the available technology in parallel to end up with necessarily overlapping solutions.
That means, he maintains, that the technologies and their enablers could work together nicely as equal partners within telcos, rather than spit sparks at each other from separate
camps.
One of the requirements specified for both 5G and Wi-Fi 6 was around density. That had to be improved drastically for Wi-Fi solutions in enterprises where, as in the home, the
number of devices requiring connection are on a steep rise as are the data rates they expect. While 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5) could support up to about 256 clients in theory, says Stuart, “With Wi-Fi 6 we can support 1024 simultaneous clients. But
it’s not just a question of throwing more resources at it, it’s about deterministically slicing up the resources much more finely.
While 5G’s ‘New Radio’ is important, 5G is being introduced in so-called non-standalone mode in many countries where it complements existing LTE/4G capacity and adds new spectrum to
the mix (as well as re-farming old spectrum), but that alone doesn’t change the game. The real 5G magic is in the network where the slicing will be supported and the complex multi-technology mix will be orchestrated.